Index #1 · rank 42 of 47 · AI · scanned 2026-07-19
Anthropic
Agent readability of https://docs.claude.com/en/docs — scored from a reproducible crawl snapshot under rubric v0.
Deterministic · 40%
76
LLM rubric · 35%
28
Task probes · 25%
67
Band
amber
Machine-checkable fundamentals
✓llms.txt at the rootllms.txt present · 8 sections · 1895 links100%
✕OpenAPI spec discoverable & validOpenAPI found (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/home) but did not validate40%
✓Heading structuremean heading-quality 100% over 7 pages100%
✕Code samples on reference pagesno reference pages identified0%
✓Auth documented with an exampleauthentication documented with a code example100%
✓Pages within agent token budget7/7 pages within 8000-token budget100%
✓Links resolve0/777 links broken100%
✓Crawler & meta hygienemean meta-hygiene 100% over 7 pages100%
Can an agent actually finish?
✓Find the authentication methodnamed an auth method with a cited sourcePASS
✕Find the rate limitsanswer states no concrete numeric rate limitFAIL
✓Construct a first valid requestproduced a request construct with a cited sourcePASS
Executed by a pinned claude-sonnet-5 agent over the crawl snapshot; graded on substance + citation, transcripts stored.
Prose quality, graded by model
Clarity
1.3/4
Completeness
0.5/4
Consistency
1.5/4
Key pages assessed
6
Is this your documentation? Every score is reproducible from stored inputs, and corrections are part of the methodology — if a page we couldn't reach is reachable to a normal agent, we'll re-scan and publish the update. See the methodology or grab your badge.